Recently
I was listening to a webcast of Hubert Dreyfus, professor of philosophy at UC
Berkeley (Nihilism and the Internet). Dreyfus wonders if the anonymity of the
Web leads to nihilism. We have discussed here, the pros and cons, and for that
matter, the levels of anonymity in the use of email list vs. blogs. It seems
clear that email, text messaging and blog posts have become much more popular
and anonymous tools than telephones because they alleviate the need to actually
communicate with another human being in person with all the accompanying
anxiety and misinterpretation.
Not
long ago, on another list, in another digital galaxy, a regular member revealed
that he had had a stroke. He mentioned his sudden dizziness, headache, numbness
and partial paralysis in his lower arm and hand. It appears that he has
recovered and is past the incident.
It
occurred to me . . .what would have happened if he had actually died of that
stroke. In these virtual communities, with these anonymous relationships, there
are infinitely more than six degrees of separation, there are no phone numbers
to call, no relatives or neighbors to ask, no one on the list would have known,
and the member would have disappeared in the cyber ether, never to be heard
from again. Think of it. Now that is despairing!
As the
use of a news aggregator protects us from news and information that we are not
interested in, or simply do not want to confront, the inherent selective,
discriminatory characteristics of digital life also protects us from the
patently unsavory aspects of human to human contact, including death. Is the
digital world then, a solipsistic construct, an elite heavily walled community
peopled only with "safe" citizens and "acceptable"
ideas?